Around four in five asylum grants issued by the British Home Office lacked sufficient evidence and were “likely to be incorrect,” according to a report by Independent Chief Inspector of Borders and Immigration (ICIBI) John Tuckett.

The findings are based on surveys of 262 decision-makers and 69 technical specialists, as well as data collected by the Home Office between July and December 2025. Around 85% of respondents said they believed senior managers “prioritized quantity over quality” when assessing asylum applications.

Tuckett, a government-appointed inspector, reviewed 47 asylum approvals issued by Home Office staff between August and September 2025. As many as 37 were found to be based on “insufficient evidence” and “were therefore likely to be incorrect,” he wrote.

While the report acknowledged that the inspection had a “limited” scope, it maintained that the findings indicated the asylum decision-making system was “not in a good state.”

The report, published on June 25, also stated that quality targets for both asylum interviews and asylum decisions have not been met anywhere within the Home Office for “over two years.” According to the document, 83% of relevant staff told an internal survey they were under pressure to make quick decisions in order to reduce waiting times.

The inspection “raised concerns that the focus on clearing the backlog ‘at all costs’ had resulted in the prioritization of quantity over quality,” Tuckett said in a statement accompanying the report. “Decision quality had declined significantly and was at an unacceptable level,” he added.

The Home Office responded by arguing that the findings were based on a small sample of cases. “Our assessment of nearly 4,000 cases shows 94% of decisions are considered ‘correct’ against agreed criteria,” it said, as quoted by The Sun.

The report comes amid heightened debate in Britain over immigration and violent crime involving foreign nationals. Last month, a Sudanese asylum seeker stabbed a man in Belfast, Northern Ireland, prompting riots and clashes with police. Anti-immigration and anti-racism demonstrations were subsequently held in several cities, highlighting the country’s growing polarization.

Last week, media reports said a Pakistani grooming gang ringleader convicted of dozens of child sex offenses in the UK could not be deported under existing law, fueling further public outrage.

Last month, Reform UK leader Nigel Farage described the government’s policies as creating a “two-tier system” marked by “anti-white racism” in a widely discussed essay. Reform UK currently leads opinion polls with 26% support, followed by the ruling Labour Party on 24%, according to Ipsos.

Labour’s poor showing in May’s local elections sparked unrest within the party, prompting Prime Minister Keir Starmer to announce that he would resign later this year.

You can share this story on social media: